Fifteen experts.
One report.
Zero blind spots.
Fifteen auditors analyse your code and your live site. Every issue: verified, priced in euros, prioritised.
This site passes its own audit: 15 domains, verified findings, code and production.
Each tool covers one box. You run a whole site.
SEMrush sees SEO, Snyk sees dependencies, Lighthouse sees performance, ZAP sees security. None sees the whole, nor links the symptom in production to its cause in the code.
Five steps. Zero guesswork.
What separates a credible audit from a list of alerts: a single scope, systematic verification, a synthesis that prioritises.
Reconnaissance
A single upfront crawl: pages, subdomains, stack, forms, endpoints. Agents receive a precise scope instead of rediscovering it fifteen times.
1 crawlFifteen analyses in parallel
Each agent examines the source code and the live site with its own standard and dedicated tools.
parallelCounter-verification
A skeptic agent tries to refute every finding: real or false positive, reproducible, severity proven. Majority vote on critical ones.
anti false positivesMerge and prioritise
The same problem often surfaces through security, performance and SEO at once. It is merged, scored, ranked by impact and effort.
impact / effortSynthesis
Global health score, executive summary, roadmap priced in days and in euros.
roadmapFifteen specialists. Each with its own standard.
No tool on the market covers these fifteen domains together. Each agent applies its own standard and reads both the code and the production.
Application security
Exploitable vulnerabilities, code and prod.
Code and architecture
Technical debt, maintainability, coherence.
Infra / DevOps
DNS, TLS, CI/CD, backups, uptime.
Data and database
Schema, indexes, N+1, personal data.
Dependencies / supply chain
CVEs, abandoned packages, licenses.
Performance / CWV
LCP, INP, CLS, weight, waterfall.
Technical SEO
Crawlability, indexing, Schema, hreflang.
GEO / AI visibility
Citability in AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity.
Analytics and measurement
Tracking, broken events, Consent Mode.
Email / deliverability
SPF, DKIM, DMARC, reputation, templates.
Accessibility
Contrast, keyboard, ARIA, screen readers.
UX / UI / journeys
Ergonomics, states, friction, mobile.
Content / editorial / i18n
Spelling, tone, freshness, translations.
Legal / GDPR
Real cookie consent, notices, records, non-EU.
CRO / conversion
Value proposition, CTA, funnel, drop-off.
What nobody else does.
SEMrush, Ahrefs, Screaming Frog, Lighthouse, Snyk, OWASP ZAP: each covers one box. Panoptic unites them, evidence included.
Two readings of your site
Google runs JavaScript. Answer engines like ChatGPT do not. Panoptic reads both versions and tells you what one sees and the other misses.
Counter-verified findings
Every issue is challenged by a skeptical agent before it enters the report. False positives, the number one plague of current tools, get filtered out.
The cause down to the code line
Other tools look at your site from outside. Panoptic also reads your repository: a slow page does not become a score, it becomes this file, this line to fix.
AI citations measured, not estimated
We put your questions to Perplexity and Gemini, then count who gets cited. The number of questions and the date appear in the report.
Continuous, and fixed for you
Re-audit on every deploy, Slack alerts and Jira tickets. We also apply the fixes, up to the pull request on your repository.
A report an executive can read.
Weighted global score, per-domain dashboard, prioritised findings, quantified impact. Generated in HTML, downloadable as PDF.
Stripe API key exposed in the client bundle
sk_live_… present in main.a3f2.js, served publicly. Reproducible.src/lib/pay.ts:12 → prod bundle /assets/main.a3f2.jsOne tool instead of six.
SEO, security, performance, accessibility, GDPR, conversion: today that means one subscription per domain, false positives everywhere, and no link between them. Panoptic covers all fifteen in one scan, and connects what none of them sees together.
| Replaces your stack | SEMrush | Snyk | Lighthouse | Siteimprove | Cookiebot | Hotjar | Panoptic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO | ✓ | · | ± | ± | · | · | ✓ |
| Security code + prod | · | ± | · | · | · | · | ✓ |
| Performance / CWV | ± | · | ✓ | ± | · | · | ✓ |
| Accessibility | · | · | ± | ✓ | · | · | ✓ |
| GDPR / cookies | · | · | · | ± | ✓ | · | ✓ |
| UX / conversion | · | · | · | ± | · | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI visibility | ± | · | · | · | · | · | ✓ |
| Server logs (real crawling) | ± | · | · | · | · | · | ✓ |
| Served HTML vs rendered DOM | · | · | · | · | · | · | ✓ |
| Cause at the code line | · | ± | · | · | · | · | ✓ |
Every separate subscription is also a silo: nobody links a GDPR fine to the line of code that causes it. Panoptic does.
The proof, in public.
Ten well-known sites audited with the same agents, results published: Wikipedia, Python.org, Hacker News and seven others.
Start free.
A discovery scan with no account, a full audit when you want depth, monitoring when you want to sleep well.
- Audit of one URL, production only
- The 15 domains, as a preview
- Health score + top 5 findings
- Repairs done by us as an option
- Repository read, read-only
- Multi-page + authenticated scan (behind login)
- 15 agents, counter-verified findings
- Roadmap priced in days and euros
- Fixes applied by our team
- Comparison with 3 competitors
- Re-audit on every deployment
- Regression detection and trend
- Alerts and full history
- Slack alerts, Jira tickets, GitHub PRs
- Team accounts and roles
- Monthly competitive benchmark
- Regressions fixed by us
Frequently asked questions
The questions we hear before a first scan. An honest answer, every time.
accessDo I have to give access to my code?
accuracyHow do you avoid false positives?
speedHow long does an audit take?
estimatesAre the euro amounts real?
readersWho is the report written for?
repairsWho applies the fixes?
Your site has blind spots. See them all.
A free scan in under a minute, or the full audit that reads your code. You choose the depth.